3 Reasons to Drive Fans to Your Band Website (and not to Social Media)

Do I really need a website for my music? With Facebook, Twitter, and all the musician-specific social networks out there, you might think that your own .COM is obsolete. But there are 3 very important reasons to drive fans to your website instead:

1) You own the address

First and foremost, you own your .COM address. As long as you maintain it, it will always point to your website. This is powerful -- you are guaranteed to own that little slice of the Internet. Even if you switch companies that host your website, your .COM can be transferred, so your fans will always be able to find you.

This is not the case with your social networking profile. They can get bought out, lose out to competition, or simply become un-cool. Thousands of bands relied on their MySpace page as their home base, then switched over to Facebook (after printing their Myspace URL on their merch... ouch!).

This isn't limited to MySpace. Those of you who've been online since 2000 will remember sites like Garageband and MP3.com. Who knows what will happen in 5 years? Will Facebook still be around? Twitter? Google+? It might be an entirely new social networking site that will be "THE" place to have a profile. Your best bet is to make sure that you always have a place where fans can go to find out about your career.

One last point about social networks: if you're really unlucky, you may wake up to find your social network page repossessed. There have been many examples of MySpace doing this. Time will tell if this also happens at Facebook or Twitter. And although his page was not repossessed, one Montreal artist had his Facebook page (with 80,000 fans) hijacked by someone, who then spammed his fans. It can take a while for Facebook to sort out situations like that, and it's a great example of how you can lose control of your social networking page.

2) You Own the Experience

With your website you also own the experience. You can control what your fans see, when they see it, and the messaging that you send to them. This means:

No Distractions
Unlike with social networking sites, on your website there are no ads to distract your fans, and there also aren't dozens of other links vying for their attention. You're able to really focus on your music and your brand. And since you have your fan's full attention, you can then direct them to your call to action to deepen their connection.

No Design Limits
With your own website, you don't have any design limits or restrictions. If you want to add a blog, or put a hi-res press kit for download, or even a special "fan-only" page, you can. Your website gives you the opportunity to make a deeper connection with your fans, without the limits of the one-size-fits-all social networks.

A Better Buying Experience

If you sell music or merch, your own website is even more critical. Social networking sales tools force fans to interact within a tiny widget, or redirect them to another website altogether to complete the transaction. Having your own store on your own site allows you to give your fans a seamless buying experience, and full control over what that experience is.

3) You Own your Data

On your .COM site, you can get far more detail on your fans than what you can get on a social networking site.

Stuff like:

  • How many people previewed my track last week?
  • Which ones downloaded it?
  • Did they skip ahead to a specific track?
  • Where do those fans live?
  • What site brought them here?

More than stats, you also own your fan list. You probably noticed that you can't move your old MySpace fans to Facebook. That's because you don't own that fan list, MySpace does. Same thing could happen whenever the next hot social network appears. There is no easy "export from Facebook" option!

Remember, your list of fan emails is gold. It allows you to always maintain contact with your fans, regardless which social networks they might be on.


Social Networks Are Still Important

This is not to say that you shouldn't be present on social networks -- they clearly have a place to interact with and find new fans. But what's even more important is to have a home base to bring your fans back to that you own, where they can always find you regardless which social networks are popular at the time.

In an upcoming post I'll talk about the "hub and spokes" method of driving fans from your social networks ("spokes") back to your website ("hub"), and list some of the best ways you can do that.

Posted by Chris on September 29, 2011 | 18 comments

Comments

Posted by AdamBHarris on September 29, 2011

This is probably wrong, but I don't take artists seriously if they don't have a website.

Posted by JFMuzik on September 30, 2011


AdamBHarris wrote:

This is probably wrong, but I don't take artists seriously if they don't have a website.


I couldnt agree with you any less... i prefer the site over a press kit any day...

Posted by MountFabric on September 30, 2011

I agree with this a lot. We use pretty much all the major social network and music site like SoundCloud and Bandcamp, but having a .COM is pretty vital. Not everyone's on facebook, or twitter, or whatever else. And I'm definitely not gonna start stamping a social network url on my merch!

Posted by MUSICFORSALE on September 30, 2011

Lots of good info. However, I have uncovered the secret to exporting from facebook and I am sure most people don't have a clue. And you are absolutely correct Chris, that list of fan emails is gold.

Posted by quietstormbeatz on October 01, 2011

good post. yes I think a site shows a level o seriousness and professionalism, let alone makes you stand out from just being on a social network, because of social networks limited design and creativity options.

Posted by TheSharpsSessions on October 01, 2011

AdamBHarris wrote:

This is probably wrong, but I don't take artists seriously if they don't have a website.

I agree. I book local acts for a small yearly music festival. I won't even look at a band unless they have an actual Web site. If you're serious about being a professional working band, you ABSOLUTELY 100% NEED a real web site that looks professionally-designed.

Bandzoogle admin
Posted by David on October 02, 2011

My opinion on mobile website is that your website should have a clean and simple design, clear navigation, and programming (no Flash widgets) that enables it to render and work well on modern smart phones (iPhone, Androids...). And that's been our focus, here at Bandzoogle.

I'm not a fan of mobile versions of websites. They always feel cheap and are usually made for the lowest common denominator, old Razr-type java phones that no one really uses to browse band websites anyways. Phones are getting browsers capable of letting their users enjoy the Internet. Let them have it.

Posted by MaxxHassell on October 05, 2011

great article and couldn't be more true...Very Happy

Posted by JFMuzik on October 07, 2011


MountFabric wrote:

I agree with this a lot. We use pretty much all the major social network and music site like SoundCloud and Bandcamp, but having a .COM is pretty vital. Not everyone's on facebook, or twitter, or whatever else. And I'm definitely not gonna start stamping a social network url on my merch!

spoken like a true musician...

Posted by soldiersound on October 11, 2011

Also if you get caught up on the social networks too much, your site can suffer. Updates content etc.. which will draw your fans away from your site, to the social networks for the latest up dates. Bad for the band!!

Posted by CrystalMusicOnline on October 16, 2011

Thanks Bandzoogle for helping me build a great one too!

Posted by SkyworksProductions on October 18, 2011

Great article. As a promoter and booking agent, I find that a band or artist's website is a valuable sales tool. Clubs and concert halls don't want to learn about a band on Facebook and comb through all the comments on a wall. A website offers so much more information in one place and makes the band or artist appear more professional. It's well worth the $19.95 per month because the website will result in more gigs for the band.

Posted by planetboogieband on October 27, 2011

I agree as well, and if it was costing a fortune to maintain a site there might be an argument, but I have a 7-piece band which means we're each bucking up about $15 a year to have this. It would be silly to even try to name all the things you can do with your site that can't be done easily with facebook. Keep up the good work Bandzoogle.

Posted by AbbyFMusic on October 31, 2011

Great post! I definitely agree with this. It's very important for artists to have their own websites.

Posted by EvilEyeGypsy on February 01, 2012


AdamBHarris wrote:

This is probably wrong, but I don't take artists seriously if they don't have a website.

I agree that a band looks much more professional with their own website and domain name. That's one of the big reasons we have our BZ site. It's also nice to have complete control over the site, and not to have to worry about the latest "upgrade" from Myspace or Facebook.

I wouldn't go so far as to not take an artist seriously if their music site is a social network site, but it does make me think that they are not very successful, or serious about their career. Considering the entry level plan for most webhosting is between $10 to $20 a month, you don't have to be The Rolling Stones to have your own site.